Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card and Related Correspondence — Bostonia, California, 1956

📅 19 October 1956 📍 Bostonia, California 🏛 Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) / Foreign Tec… 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

The Air Force investigated a 1956 photograph of a 'saucer-like' object in Bostonia, California, and concluded it was a double exposure of the moon and a light fixture. The student who took the photo maintained it was genuine, leading to a multi-year correspondence with the Air Force.

This document archive details the investigation into a UFO sighting reported by a student in Bostonia, California, on 19 October 1956. The student, while completing a photography class assignment, took a time-exposure photograph of the moon. Upon developing the film, a saucer-like object appeared in the print. The student claimed to have no knowledge of how the object appeared on the film. The case was subsequently investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI). The Air Force's Aerospace Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) and later the Foreign Technology Division (FTD) conducted a technical analysis of the photographs. Their findings concluded that the image was a double exposure, consisting of a time-exposure of the moon and a separate exposure of a light fixture. The analysis highlighted that the moon's path on the film was broken in both direction and time, suggesting a lapse of 2-3 minutes during which the camera was moved. Furthermore, the investigators identified evidence of photographic manipulation, specifically 'dodging' and 'burning in' techniques. The Air Force concluded that the object resembled a conventional glass light fixture found on ceilings. Despite the student's insistence that the photograph was genuine and the support of her instructor, the Air Force maintained that the evidence suggested a hoax or, at minimum, a double exposure. The correspondence included in the file shows a persistent effort by the student and later by a private citizen to challenge the Air Force's conclusions, arguing that the photograph was an unretouched image of a space vehicle. The Air Force consistently rejected these claims, citing the technical evidence of the double exposure and the lack of any physical evidence to support the existence of an unidentified object. The file also contains internal Air Force communications regarding the policy of not releasing UFO case photos to the public and the handling of such reports to avoid detrimental publicity.

The object resembles the glass fixtures usually found hanging from ceiling - lighting arrangements.

Official Assessment

The photograph was determined by FTD to be a double exposure, the two images being a timed exposure of the moon and an exposure of a light fixture.

The Air Force concluded the photograph was a hoax or a double exposure, noting that the moon's path was broken in direction and time, and that the object resembled a conventional light fixture.

Witnesses

Key Persons