Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card: Sighting of 15 March 1956

📅 15 March 1956 📍 Harrisburg, S. Central Pa. and New York City 🏛 ATIC 📄 Record Card and Message Form

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

A March 1956 sighting by TWA pilots of a bright, tailed object was officially classified as a meteor by ATIC. Despite this, internal military communications reveal dissatisfaction with the investigation's quality and a request for more detailed follow-up.

This document consists of a Project 10073 record card and subsequent military message traffic regarding an aerial sighting reported on March 15, 1956. The sighting involved a single object observed by two TWA pilots and one ground observer. The object was described as having a bluish-white front with a reddish-orange tail, appearing to be the size of a quarter held at arm's length. It was observed moving from west to east over a duration of five seconds, accompanied by a roaring sound. The object was seen descending in the northern sky. Military authorities at the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) initially reviewed the report and concluded that the sighting was almost certainly a meteor. This conclusion was based on the object's appearance, the presence of a tail, the duration of the event, the trajectory, the colors, and the fact that it was observed from widely scattered locations, suggesting a high altitude. However, internal correspondence dated May 4, 1956, from ATIC to the Commander of the Air Defense Command at Ent AFB, Colorado, expressed frustration regarding the investigation. The ATIC noted that the review was difficult due to an insufficiency of data and a lack of follow-up to obtain necessary details. The message requested further investigation, specifically asking if the observers had seen meteors before, if they believed the object could have been a meteor, and how the object differed from a typical meteor or fireball. The document highlights the procedural challenges in investigating UFO reports during this period, specifically the tension between initial assessments and the need for more rigorous data collection.

This headquarters is of the opinion that this sighting was generated by a meteor for the following reasons: the description of the object; the fact that it had a tail (or trail); the description of that tail; the duration of the sighting; the course of the object; the colors of the object; and the fact that this object was seen at widely scattered points indicating that it was very high in atmosphere.

Official Assessment

This headquarters is of the opinion that this sighting was generated by a meteor for the following reasons: the description of the object; the fact that it had a tail (or trail); the description of that tail; the duration of the sighting; the course of the object; the colors of the object; and the fact that this object was seen at widely scattered points indicating that it was very high in atmosphere.

The sighting was determined to be a meteor.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Military Units