Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Project 10073 Record Card and February 1956 Sighting Reports
AI-Generated Summary
This document contains a Project 10073 record card for a February 1956 sighting in Iowa, alongside a compilation of various UFO press reports from the same month. It highlights the military's process of documenting and evaluating these reports, often concluding that many sightings lack sufficient data or are misidentified natural phenomena.
This document is a compilation of records and press clippings related to unidentified aerial phenomena (UFOs) from February 1956. The primary document is a Project 10073 Record Card detailing a sighting in South Newton, Iowa, on February 29, 1956. The witness described a round, white object, the size of a pea, which changed colors over a duration of four to five minutes. The official conclusion for this specific case was that there was insufficient data for evaluation, noting that positional data was missing. The document also includes a series of press clippings reporting various sightings throughout February 1956 in locations such as Newark, New Jersey; Salmon River, California; Somers Point, New Jersey; Noel, Missouri; Clearwater, Florida; Vallejo, California; Vancouver, B.C., Canada; Santa Barbara, California; Fairfax, Oklahoma; and Chula Vista, California. These reports describe a wide variety of phenomena, including red discs, luminous objects, and objects described as 'kidney bean' shaped. Some reports involve specific witnesses, such as newspaper editor Bob Sterling in Missouri and a couple near Somers Point, New Jersey, who observed a saucer-like object for nearly half an hour. Additionally, the document contains a technical note regarding a photograph of a Canberra jet, explaining that condensation phenomena (contrails) can sometimes be mistaken for strange objects, particularly under specific atmospheric conditions like those found near the coast. The document concludes with a list of March 1956 sightings, categorizing them by location, observer, and evaluation, with many being attributed to astronomical phenomena or balloons, while others remained classified as having insufficient data.
Positional data not included. No evaluation due to insufficient data.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
Insufficient Data for Evaluation
Positional data not included. No evaluation due to insufficient data.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- August RobertsSaucer researcher