Declassified UFO / UAP Document

Project 10073 Record Card — New York, N.Y., 18 June 1954

📅 18 June 1954 📍 New York, N.Y. 🏛 ATIC 📄 sighting_report

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

AI-Generated Summary

TL;DR

This document is a Project 10073 record card detailing a 1954 civilian sighting of an ovoid, metallic object in New York. The Air Technical Intelligence Center concluded there was insufficient data to identify the object, noting potential errors in the witness's speed and duration estimates.

On June 18, 1954, at approximately 8:25 p.m. E.D.T., a civilian witness and a friend observed an unidentified aerial object from the roof of a five-story building in New York, N.Y. The sighting lasted between 10 and 15 seconds. The witnesses described the object as ovoid in shape, metallic in composition, and silvery in color. It traveled on a straight course from the southwest to the northeast with no apparent deviation. The witnesses estimated the speed to be between 400 and 700 miles per hour, though they noted the altitude was indeterminable. They assumed the object was at a high elevation because it reflected the rays of the sun, which was already sinking low in the west. There were no audible sounds associated with the object. The sky conditions were described as early twilight and perfectly clear, with visibility between 15 and 20 miles. The wind was blowing from the east to the west at approximately 12 miles per hour. The report was processed under Project 10073. In the official evaluation, the investigator noted that the reported duration or speed was likely in error, as the object could not have passed through the reported arc in that timeframe. While the investigator suggested the object might have been a meteor, they concluded that there was insufficient data for a firm conclusion, noting that exact positional data was not provided.

Duration or speed in error. Object could not pass through reported arc. Probably a meteor, however, insufficient data for firm conclusion, exact positional data not included.

Official Assessment

Insufficient Data for Evaluation

The duration or speed estimate was considered in error by the evaluator. The object could not pass through the reported arc. It was suggested it might be a meteor, but there was insufficient data for a firm conclusion.

Witnesses

Key Persons

Organizations