Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Incident #128 Sighting Report — Hobson, Ohio, 8 May 1948
AI-Generated Summary
Incident #128 involved a civilian report of phosphorescent, oval-shaped objects in Hobson, Ohio, on May 8, 1948. Project Grudge evaluators concluded the sighting was likely a reflection of an airplane beacon or searchlight.
This document contains a sighting report and subsequent evaluation regarding Incident #128, which occurred in Hobson, Ohio, on May 8, 1948. The report, filed by a civilian witness, describes the observation of several objects that were described as phosphorescent and oval in shape. The objects were reported to travel at great speed and exhibited periodic behavior, including occasional bursting and disintegration. The official evaluation, extracted from the Project Grudge report, characterizes the original incident report as entirely inadequate for reaching a firm conclusion. The evaluator, Dr. Hynek, suggests that the phenomenon likely represents an airplane beacon or searchlight reflecting against an overcast sky. This interpretation is offered to explain the observed characteristics of the objects, although the evaluator notes that the original report failed to state the weather conditions at the time of the sighting. The document also includes an index of incidents evaluated by Dr. Hynek, categorizing Incident #128 under 'Miscellaneous (reflections, auroral streamers, birds, etc.)' within the non-astronomical category.
Once again, the report given is entirely inadequate for a conclusion.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The phenomenon described resembles the observation of an airplane beacon or search light reflecting against an overcast.
The report was deemed inadequate for a definitive conclusion. The evaluator suggested the phenomenon was likely an airplane beacon or searchlight reflection, noting that the description of the object as periodic, phosphorescent, oval-shaped, and traveling at great speed supported this interpretation, though weather conditions were not provided in the report.
Witnesses
Key Persons
- Dr. HynekEvaluator