Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Incident #99 Sighting Report — Vaasa, Finland, 3 January 1948
AI-Generated Summary
This document details a January 1948 sighting of a 'shining object' with a long tail in Vaasa, Finland. Military intelligence concluded the data was insufficient for identification, suggesting it might have been a fireball.
This document file contains reports and correspondence regarding an unidentified aerial phenomenon observed in Finland in early January 1948. The primary incident, designated as Incident #99, involved a sighting on 3 January 1948 in the vicinity of Vaasa, Finland. According to reports relayed by the Military Attache in Helsinki, a brightly shining object with a long tail was observed moving from west to east for a duration of approximately 30 seconds. A subsequent report mentioned in the same file notes another shining object observed on 5 January 1948 in Pietarsaari, which was visible for 10 seconds moving from north to south, with eyewitnesses reporting that flames were ejected and grey streaks were left in the sky. The Finnish press at the time began using the term 'flying saucers' to describe these light phenomena. The official evaluation by the Air Materiel Command concluded that the information provided was insufficient to establish even a vague identification of the objects. Investigators suggested that the object seen on 3 January could have been a fireball, though they noted that the 30-second duration of the observation seemed 'unduly long' and might be subject to considerable error. The file also includes a reference to a previous report from 20 December 1947 in Utsjoki, Northern Finland, near the Norwegian border, and mentions that these sightings might represent a revival of a series of alleged flying phenomena, referencing 'WEEKA 96'. The documentation consists of a formal transmittal from the Department of the Air Force to the Air Materiel Command, a check-list for unidentified flying objects, and a staff message from the Department of the Army.
The object seen could have been a fireball, although the length of time of observation seems unduly long. Perhaps this is subject to considerable error?
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The object seen could have been a fireball, although the length of time of observation seems unduly long. Perhaps this is subject to considerable error?
Information provided is insufficient to establish even vague identification of the object.
Key Persons
- BurrillMilitary Attache