Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Incident #37 Sighting Report — Phoenix, Arizona, 14 October 1947
AI-Generated Summary
Incident #37 involves a 1947 sighting of a small, fast-moving object by two pilots in Arizona. The Air Materiel Command ultimately discredited the report due to internal contradictions regarding the object's size and distance.
This document details Incident #37, a sighting that occurred on 14 October 1947, approximately eleven miles north-northeast of Cave Creek, Arizona. Two mine operators, both of whom were experienced pilots, observed a single object traveling from the northwest to the southeast. The object was reported to be at an altitude of 8,000 to 10,000 feet, moving at a speed of 350 mph. The witnesses described the object as having a diameter of approximately three feet and noted that it resembled a 'flying wing.' Its color was reported as reddish against the blue sky and black against white clouds. The observation lasted between 45 seconds and one minute, with no sound reported. The report includes an evaluation by the Air Materiel Command, which expresses skepticism regarding the account. The investigators noted that the witnesses provided conflicting remarks, with one observer initially suggesting the object was a buzzard before changing their mind. Furthermore, the AMC concluded that if the object were truly 10,000 feet away and appeared only three feet wide, it would have to be an enormous object, a contradiction that the investigators felt discredited the report. The document also includes index lists from the Project Grudge report, categorizing various incidents by their nature, such as astronomical, balloons, aircraft, or those lacking sufficient evidence for explanation. The final assessment for Incident #37 is that there is nothing astronomical about the event and the provided information does not suggest any other plausible explanation.
If the object was actually 10,000 ft distant, and yet appeared three feet wide to the observer, it would of necessity been huge. This sole point of contention tends to discredit the report.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
From the limited data furnished in this report, it is difficult to arrive at any conclusion. If the object was actually 10,000 ft distant, and yet appeared three feet wide to the observer, it would of necessity been huge. This sole point of contention tends to discredit the report.
The report notes conflicting descriptions from the two witnesses, one of whom initially thought it was a buzzard. The AMC opinion highlights the discrepancy between the reported size and distance as a reason to discredit the report.
Witnesses
- [illegible]Mine owner (Pilot)
- [illegible]
Key Persons
- Dr. HynekEvaluator