Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Analysis of Samples 11 and 12
Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?
Across the Airwaves
You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.
AI-Generated Summary
This document records the geological analysis of two samples by FOA 1 in 1946. The samples were identified as shale limestone rather than rocket debris.
This document, likely a page from a larger technical report, details the geological analysis of two samples, referred to as 'Prov 11' and 'Prov 12'. The text describes an examination conducted by State Geologist Eklund of the S.O.U. on August 9, 1946. Regarding the initial find, Eklund concluded that the material was shale limestone (skifferkalk) rather than debris from a rocket projectile. This conclusion was supported by qualitative testing, which revealed a strong positive reaction for calcium and gas evolution when the material was exposed to acid. Regarding 'Prov 11', the report notes that no further information is available and that no visit to the discovery site was conducted by FOA 1. For 'Prov 12', the report states that no further analysis was performed because spectral analysis indicated that the sample was consistent with the previously analyzed 'Prov 4:2', thereby confirming it was not of extraterrestrial or rocket-related origin.
Man torde därför kunna säga, att det med största sannolikhet är ett stycke skifferkalk och ej en rest från en raketprojektil.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The samples are identified as shale limestone and not remnants of a rocket projectile.
State Geologist Eklund examined the find on August 9, 1946, and concluded it was shale limestone. Qualitative analysis showed positive calcium results and gas evolution in acid. Sample 12 was found to be consistent with the previously analyzed sample 4:2.
Key Persons
- EklundState Geologist