Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Technical Assessment of Projectile Stability
Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?
Across the Airwaves
You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.
AI-Generated Summary
A 1946 technical report by an engineer at Flygmotor analyzing the flight stability of a projectile. The author concludes the object required wings to maintain its trajectory and noted the absence of a V1-style superstructure.
This document, dated August 24, 1946, and authored by Bergsingenjör (Mining Engineer) Gustaf Göthberg at Flygmotor, provides a technical assessment regarding the flight stability of a projectile. The author asserts that in order for the projectile to maintain the straight trajectory previously observed, it must be equipped with wings. He posits that certain irregularities he had previously noted at the front end of the object could be the attachment points for smaller wings, drawing a comparison to the design of the V1-bomb. Furthermore, the author explicitly states that no superstructure, such as the one present on the V1-bomb, was observed on this projectile. The document concludes with a list of two enclosures: one watercolor painting and one map at a scale of 1:50,000.
Någon överbyggnad, som finns på Vl-bomben, kunde ej iakttagas.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The author concludes that for the projectile to maintain a straight trajectory, it must be equipped with wings. He suggests that previously observed irregularities at the front end could potentially be the endpoints of smaller wings, similar to those on the V1-bomb.
The projectile requires wings for stability; no superstructure was observed.