Declassified UFO / UAP Document
Summary of Investigations at Locations A, B, C, and D
Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?
Across the Airwaves
You're on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.
AI-Generated Summary
A 1946 Swedish military report summarizing the investigation of four potential impact sites. The report concludes that the sites were likely caused by natural phenomena or motorboat activity rather than projectile impacts.
This document, dated July 29, 1946, and signed by Eric Malmberg, provides a summary of investigations into four specific locations (A, B, C, and D) regarding potential projectile impacts. Regarding location A, where an object was observed to have struck, the report notes that investigations have been ongoing but have failed to produce positive results. The author suggests that the pit found at this location may have been caused by propeller wash from a motorboat that had been docked nearby, noting that dead fish were also observed in other areas at that time. While the possibility of further probing is mentioned, the author concludes that it is unlikely to yield better results. The report notes that the most effective way to investigate further would be to drain the lake, but Öv Dahlgren advises against this due to the high cost and time required. Regarding location B, the report concludes that the phenomenon was likely a relatively large whirlwind. Due to the significant difficulties associated with investigating this site, Öv Dahlgren does not recommend any further action. Finally, the report states that locations C and D have causes other than projectile impacts and will not be investigated further.
Gropen kan ha orsakats av propellervattnet från en motorbåt, som legat vid bryggan.
PDF not loading? Download the PDF directly
Official Assessment
The pit at A may have been caused by propeller wash from a motorboat. Location B is likely a whirlwind (tromb). Locations C and D have other causes than projectile impacts.
Investigations at location A yielded no positive results, and further probing is deemed unlikely to be effective. Draining the lake at A is considered too expensive and time-consuming. Location B is attributed to a whirlwind. Locations C and D are dismissed as not being related to projectile impacts.
Key Persons
- DahlgrenOfficer overseeing investigations