P~OJ::CT 1Cv73 hcCG.~O 1. O H TIME CROUi'" ~-LOC ATION 10. CONCLUSION t . HIIM~ER OF OIIJECTS Other (tJNRC:LIABl.F. RE?CRT) S. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. ISRIEF SU:.WARY AI'+V AHALYliS z:ot R~ porte,\ to. TYPE OF OBSERVATIOH Ground-Visu9l CC;~u:::.N"TS: The observer a lso subni t ted 2 prints of wh &t z.t; 1 . COURSE said was a U?'O that he saw and. photographed in Auguot 1967. Photo a nalys i s determined that the UFO i mage was the resu~t c~ _ _ l j_o_t_R_e_:p_o_r_t_e_d .r oreign material present on the negat ive holder o f tre printir.c:; 9. PHYSICAL EVIDEHC! TDFT (UFO) UFO Sightings of Aug 1967 and 8 .run 1C)68 Brooklyn, New York 11215 Reference your UFO ~ightings of Aug 1967 and 3 Jun 1968. ~lthough we consider these sightings too old to investigat e p r operly, ve did submit your p hotographs to our photogrophj c experts. '.rheir :findings are as f clllo-ws: "'There is a definite pattern o f li;ht il:'l.sgez-J on both prints. There are at least f17e o f these images in addition to the particular one on each print i denti- fied by the sender a s a UFO. An o,erlay 'WaS constructed for print ~lr. 1 with tick marks over each image including that identified as a UFO. ~ben ~bis overlay ~as applied to print Nr. 2 , the tick marks correspond per f ectly to the images present. Due to the fact that there is a finite pattern or like images altho~h the field of viev differs considerably, i t is most likely that there was a J:&t"tern of :f'orei;;n material present on the negative holder o f the printing device. l!ECTOR QUur.rA.lUllA, Jr, Lt Colonel , USAF Chief, Aerial Phenomene Branch Aerospace Technologies Division Production Directorate SUBJECT: UFO -MANHATTAN ISL.t'tND PI: Chapin l. The follot,ting comments pertain to imagery N. Y . , on two black and white prints DATE: 16 Ha y 69 to FTD for is a definite pattern of light imagery on both prints. There are at least five of these images in addition to the particular one on each print identified by the sender as a U. F . O. An overlay was constructed for print Nr. l with tick marks over each image including that identified as a UFO. When this overlay was applied to print Nr. 2, the tick marks correspond perfe~tly to the images present. Due to the fact that there is a definite pattern of like images although the field of view diff~rs considerabl:JI it i s most likely that there was a pattern of foreign material present on the hegative of the printing device. ~he grid overlay i s being forwarded with the returned prints to TDPT/UFO. MVJ IJ!. . rJ OJ)WL cL? t c olrrM:. Ji bc4d ..... ~, W rlq T Do