St.f' l9f..7 Loutzd.'lle. Pcn:l:Jv1van1a CONCLUSION .C. NUMBER OF OBJECTS LENGTH OF OBSERVATION TYPE OF OBSERVATION 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Probable ( SA'l,E.CJ.ITE) BRIEF SUMMARY AIIO ANALYSIS Prevloue edlllone ot thla fo,.. m r be uud. Alltt' l t t-f RtJ"l-\.c"A" PHOTOGRAPHIC 1. Type and make or camera ,,. 6 1'1. I C. A- 2. Type , tocal length 3. Brand and type of film A .SA-6 '1- 4. Shutter speed used IS 5 ~ns opening used; that is, "f" stop 6. Filters used /Yo AI~ Was tripod or solid stand used 8. Was "parming" used tl.b 9. Exact direction camera was pointing with relation to true N rth, ita angle vlth respect to the ground.-;-~8c v T 7.>" 10. If supplemental information is unobtainable, the minimum camera data required are the type of camera, and the smallest and largest "f" stop and shutter speed readings of the camera "-z.c~-APJj I eRe. -AU local investigator cannot dete~1De the cause or a e1ght1D&, only then 1a the report traasmltted to the Aerial Phenomena Branch ( Ject Blue Book) at Wrilbt-Patteraon ArB, Obio. can be obtained troa tbe 7 FUrther 1ntormat1on on aatell1te lat Aerospace 8qua4ron, IDt AFB, c. MAIA'rl' Colonel, USAF tor ot Technology and a&bayateaaa 1. T\wo Polaroid Photograph 2. Two Color Slides p TP ( T lJ -E T /-,;r F C I t flio