3. SOURCE 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS . 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION I 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground Visual ! 10. CONCLuSION rtircraf~)poss)ble) 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND Ai~AL YSIS Obs~rvers noted what a.ppear~d to b e a b:a.ll of lig:1t .fL .. OUl. 20 to 70 degrees above the horizo~. Froill 70 to 90 deerees bove t he horizon t~e object :ooked like ~ spinr.in6 disk. 1he obscrve~s thoue;ht the object ~ .. ~.;j ~n aircraft in t r ouble until it st!e:;ied to ex:-olori~ ar .. a r:.o sound v.;o.s heard ;A.nd no dt.!brio fell. 'Lhe object mov(!ci steadily on a horthv1est he-dinz . At one time the object app~ared to hover, incre ~he li;ht i ntensicy , then mov~ on t oward the (f .i . The inv~stL;n.ting of~icial st :;J t. t t h e ,,..5.tnes3~s thou~ht t hey viere observint:; c:..r, .:-..ircro.ft ur.til they were un;1blr! to reconcile -;;hat t y .-:ere obu~rvine to the nor- mal b~havior of an aircr~ft. The description is con- sistent with thDt of an aircraft obs~rvation. It appers the witnesses s an aircr~ft. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FTD SE P 6 3 0-329 (TOE) Prevloua edltlona of thla form mey be uud, ,~ :iLiTY ;. E~G S THO -i