PROJECT 1G073 RECO;:(O 1. DATE TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION . ~-- Aircraft(possible) -j ~ : .i. NUMBER OF OBJECTS <;. lENGTH OF OB5&RVATIOH /1. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground Visual. 8. PtiOTOS Observers noted a st~r shaped object moving very fMst lew en the horizon. Green and red colors were noted during the observ~tion. The object moved fr~-n ,,iest te East and appeared to stGp on ~ccasion. Observer cl-i~s that he has seen several UrOs bef~re this Qbservation. All the sightings could be placed in the "light in the sky" category. There wa&.s air tr-ffic around the are at the ttme ef the sighting. Investigating officer feels that the witnesses saw reported an aircraft. Ne ether evidence te the contrarY h&s been ~ffered. 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE fTD SEP 63 0329 (TOE) Prevloue ecUUone of thh torm may be u .. d DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HIADQUAUIU 46030 AI. IAU GaOUP' (AOC) STIWAif All PORC: IASI, HIW YOtiC t25SO AnN Of 46030DC 28 November 1966 UFO Report FTD (AFSC) The attached report is submitted in accordance with paragraph 8, FOR THE COMMANDER D. C. BOYD, L Col, USAF Chief, Operations & Training Division A . De scription of the Object (s ): 1. Shape: Shaped like a star, but was moving very fast. It appeared to be low on the horizon and was blinking. 2. Size compared to a know object: undetermined, but it did not change in size . Green and red 4 Number: One 5. Formation, if more than one: 6. Any discernible features or details: Tail, trail, or exhaust, including size of same compared to size of object(s}: 8. Sound; if heard, de scribe sound: None 9. Other pertinent or unusual features: B. Description of Course of Object(s): 1. What first called the attention of observer(s) to the object(s): The observers are interested in the UFO Program and spend considerable time watching for them. 2. Angle or elevation and azimuth of object(s) when first observed: No asimuth or elevation measurements were take n but the object appeared low on the horizon about 1 S miles away. Appeared to be over or in the vicinity of Newburgh, NY. 3. Angle or elevation and azimuth of object(s) upon disappearance: No angular measurements were taken. The object disappeared over the horizon 4. Description of flight path and maneuvers of object(s): It moved from West to East and a ppeured to stop on occ~siofl .. 5. How did the object(s) disappear: Move d o v e r the h orizon. 6. How long (were) the object(s) visible: More than five minutes. C. Manner of Observation: 1 Ground -visual 2. Optical Aids: None D. Time and Date of Sighting: 1. Zulu time-date group of sighting: 0002,4 Nov 66 2. Light conditions: very clear night. E. Location of Observer(s): Monroe, New York F. Identifying Information on Observer{s): 1. Military or Civilian: Civilian 2. Name: Mr. and Mrs. 4. Mailing Address: nroe, N.Y. 5. Occupation: Sander in the Paint Shop for the Ford Motor Company 6. Estimate of Reliability: Mr s 95% d eaf according to Mr Mr. color blind. H e was very excitable whe n talking on the teleph o n e . fee e accurately reported what he saw but does not have the background nor the training to distinguish what he saw from aircraft in flight. G. vVeather and vVinds -Aloft CondltonS' a t Time and Plac3 of Sightings: 1. Observer(s) account of w eathe r conditions: 2. Report from nearest AWS or U.S. Weather Bureau Office: 3. Ceiling: 4. Visibility: 5 Amount of cloud cover: 6. Thunderstorms in are a and quadrant in which located: 7. Vertical temperature gradient: H. Any Other Unusual Activity or Condition: I. Interception or Identification Action Taken: J . Location, approxima t e altitude, Rn<;l gt;neral direction of fli g h t o f any air trnffic or balloon releases in the are a which might possibl y account for the sighting: No r mal traffic a r o und Ste wart AF B. K. Position, title and comments of the preparing officer: Mr. indicated that he was extremely interested in the UFO program and spe nds considerable time reading about and looking for unidentified flying objects. He claims he has seen quite a few in the past. All that he has seen would be placed in a "light phenomena" category in that he has seen many lights but with no definite I feel that he is sincere and accurate in his reporting but he is unable to offer any information that could be scientifically investigated. The object he has reported could very easily have been aircraft traffic around Stewart AFB. No other evidence to the contrary has been offered. . J ARCHIBALD, Captain, USAF Investigating Officer L. Existence of physical evidence, such as materials and photographs: N/A