1. OA lE TIME GROUP 1. NllMSE R Oi= OSJECTS ~ . LENGTH OF OBSERVATION Not Reported ! .. TYPE OF 03SERVATION Gro1U'Xi -FMa r N ct. Reported $3, PHOTOS 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PROJECT 10073 RECORD 2. LOCATION Zast Coast United States 10. CONCLUSION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS SES FUPORT El'ra.luation by Radar Analysis Section f T D S E P 6 3 0329 (TO E) Prevloue ed1Uona of lhla lo,. mJ' b uaad, Hcmo, TDEH/UFO, 23 Aug 65, Request for Ra(b.r Analysis (U) (TDEED/Capt Dunlap/pkj/71~201) TO: TDSW/UFO 1. T:-..e attached memo for t he record provides insufficient informa- tio~ ~o enable a radar analysis of the situation. In order to per:orm an analysis, it 'tlOuld be necessary to know the typeB of r.lcia.rs involved, their operating radio f1:equenc ies , types oE signa 1 s g.::n~:::ated, weathe r conditions bet'tv~en the radars and the indlcatt.!c.l t2.rg~t, equipment location and t h e dircctlons of target travel. 2. The motion of the t arget appears to rule out direct observation, as ~atural objects would not be able to cl1ange directions radically at ~he observed speeds. This leads one to believe that the obser- va: :.ons 'tver e via ano~alous propagation of the radar m:wes. \.fuen at!:l:>sphe ric conditions are right, anomalous propagations can play m.::t..-;.y tric ks and, of course, are difficult to substantiate. Th i.s OCC'.lrrence may be one of these cases; ho\vever, additional informa- ti:m could prove otheno1ise. / JOEX \.J. VEGA 0, '- Lt Colonel, USAF Act:.ng Director Electronics Directorate rlr;:AOQlJARTERS FOREIG N TECHNOLOG ( AIR FO:.:'!CE SY5 r .:::w; CO~''-\A~J;J HZAOQJAi~ r.cn!i FO!=<~IGN TECHNOLuGY D IVIS ON Alfl FORCE SYSTE::-.15 CO"''MANIJ IJNIT<:;O 5T-'TZ5 AlA .WO'\CE c r.rc:sr)J~m rt\O) r:oci .;n T.'chnolo:;y llivision .\r:-: Tt)l:i: Ul<!j :Juint: ~,.!.i.:>lt.-Patt~rsun A.FG "Jhi.u, tijLS3 Fl'CS J t o )!ORAD for C'"Ll u "