PROJECT1~3RECORD 1. DATi!' TIM! GROUP 2. LOCATION 3. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS Photo anal7sia that the slide appeared to have been caused b7 a processing defect. Probably caused b7 a drop or bleach hitting t~e film prior to the first 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FTD SEP 63 0329 (TOE) One 35 color slide taken at the Rev York World's Fair showed an unknown object upon processing. PNYioae ed&tiOfte ol t!l!e lu .. ,. ._ ~a HEADQUARTERS: UNITED STATES AIRFORCE Washington, D.C. Gentlemen, Chance has put me 1n possession ot what I believe to ;rbe a very tine, 3 color slide showinl a presunwbl7 .. ~-untdentltied tl7in1 obJect. . ~;:{~ : ... The. phenomenon is perfect~7 spherical~ ver7 1 scent:~ r-1.: ... .:. obv1ousl)" in hor tal movement. It is surrounded b7 a . . t"' : . :purple halo or aura ( probably compressed atmosphere).'~ : =~: -~.i~: . ~-\A\:_: ... It quite accidantaJ.ly showed up 1D a picture. ~ took : .. ~ ~ ._.;,., : . _( liay .30 ) of the Belg Village at the Bev York World' 8 -.~-~ : the obJect ~as not apparent to the naked .eye at ~"":-Fair~ and ~ ~the time~ I understand romBevsday, a Long Is .:It you think it may possibly be or interest to h1m_:-and '.tntorm me at what address he can be reached~ l' .11 ~ g.lad I .,.(: to send the picture to him. Hempstead~ N.Y. OF ----PAG PHOTO ANAL VSJS REPO;~T DATE OF REPORT 20 December SUSPECT UFO LOCATION NEW YORK WORIJ) t S FAIR DATE 30 MAY 1965 PHOTOGRAPHY QUALITY GOO_D _ 1 . PURPOSE: This report anST..ters vlork Order 65-103 submitted by Major H. Quintanjl1 a, Jr., requesting analysis of a color slide to determine the cause of a circular object visible in the sky. Analysis was conducted by the Photo AnaJ.ysis ~vision (TDDPA), and tha Photo . Processing Division (TDDPP). : 2. ANALYSIS: Examination or the color slide reveal.ed no signature to the reported object in the sky. However, after close examination, tr...e image in the slide appeared to have bean . caused by a processing defect. The defect was possibly caused by a drop o bleach hitting the film prior to the first development. CHARLES A. BURTON . 1st Lieutenant, USAF : Photo Interpreter APPROVED BY: RICHARD L. CHANCE Captain, USAF Chief, Photo Analysis Division viiLBER PRICE, JR. ~ Director, Photo Exploitation Directorate ENGINEE lNG SUPPORT WO 0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS PPT NUMBER r DESCRIPTION OF WORK a . PHOTO ANALYSIS Requnt, of the 8U4e u to ot tbe obJect 1D the .q 11 REFERENCE MATERIALt color alicle, ltr 1W 0 , aU terial be returned upon I Cf:RTIFY THAT THIS WORIC IS AUTHORIZED DEADLINE WITHIN MY DIVISION. BY ME AND THAT IT HAS THE FOLLOWING PttiORITY AND ., .. SIGNATURE OF APPROVING DIVISION CHIEF ENGINE:ERlNG SUPPORT. MONITOR-~.r------------ASSISTANT------------~ FINAL WORK TO BE IN FORM 0' : 0 ENGIN[RING NOT D COMPUTATION OPt REPORT OoRAWtNG WORk R[QUEST APPROVED BY: OEAOLINE DATa:..E:------ PRtORerv NUMBER DoNE -~-~-0 TWO ---- 0 THREE p RIP l!G".s..s tMG!. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON OPPJCIC Of' THE .IECftiCTAIIY This is in reply to your letter of 20 July 1965 in which you stated that you are in possession ot a 35 '"" color slide of an nnidentitied aerial obJect. I ~:r you w1lJj :rorva,d the ori !J 1 t and inform you v.a. ve to this ot:tice, Sincerely, Chief, Civil Bi'sn Community Rel ions Dt. tis i o!. . ottice ot In rmation