1. bATE 'riME G.OU' 2. LOCATION 10. CONCLUSION 4. NUMIER 0, OIJICTS Echo I was CNer Alaba.t:e. at 802 F.I moving to the SE. Sjghti~ One descr.i ive of a Satellite.observation. 5. LENGTH 011 OISIIVATION 11. lltll, SUMMARY ANO ANALYSIS. 10 :-anut es 6. TYPE Of OISIIYATION Grourxi-Visual (BX) 9. PHYSICAL EYIDINCI Starl j ke object observed on ~Test ern sky rising overhead. Observed throughK TX and Field glasses. Rouni and miny. Sate:!..lit e considered as possible. . HKADQUA .. TK .. I FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AI" .,OfltCK IYITBMI COMMAND UMITaD 8TATa8 Alit "OitCa WfUeHT~ATTalt80N Alit "OitCa aAia, OHIO auaHcT: u:ro Sighting, Piedmont, Alabama, 4 May 65 Tos Bq USAF SAFOI-cc (Mrs Hunt) Washington, D C 20330 We have recei a letter'trom , Rt 3 requesting cation ot an object which she observed on' the night ot 4 Ma7 65. !Ihe letter stated that the obJect rose traa the north-western slq to a point directly to settle in the vet Thia obJect re- a aatelllte. U her letter was ill error the the object actually disappeared to the southeast,. in all ility the object was ECBD I. Thia satellite waa over at 08:02pm, at a high &Dgle. It Miss Chambers does not teel that the object was ECHO I she should till ... out an !"I'll Form 164 and return 1 t to your .ot:t'ice. . FOR 'tHE C Colonel, USAF Deputy tor Tecluaology and SUbsystema YOU THE NUCLEUS OF SECURITYI (j I'< Pt Ni #~M CSr:cS\~