PROJECT 10073 RECORD 1. DATE TIME GROUP 2. LOCATION 4. NUMBER Of OBJECTS 5. LENGTH Of OBSERVATION 6. TYPE 011 OBSERVATION Grourr.:.-v:..s uU 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 10. CONCLUSION 11. BRIIII SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Bean of light oo rei n5 fro~"'l t::e grct~"r~ ai=:!ed a t the moon. ~litre ss r efle ction .~a.s that she di d not ~ce the ~:loon bu t FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TOE) PNl- edltloa ol W fosa .. , be ued. r. J. i!; ...... gar iioov~r v.ashiug t '-'n, L. t,;. Dear .:iir: .r\.ahGk .:.i, ~.J.SSOUr.l un the night of October 7, at 9 p.m. CST, I ~alked out on my porch f~cing the east, and hapr~ned to glance up at what I thought was the moon, 'Vhich was east and slight- ~y northeast. 1 blinkad and glanced again, then opened the screen door, lookgd, took off my glass-es, an~ still the thing l saw persisted. It looked like an electric ~ight pole ( reflacting light) raaching frow the earth to tile Illoon. ~or fea~ I V\iaS imagining things, I ran to the neighbor, .:.!.Del~ taen-rJ.ger ca..ua out to look, Ln:: sh~ v:as just ~s -zria ~s 1 s. ~t ~=~0 p.c. 1 ~ent to look ag~in, alld it VJ ::1S gone, no rtoon, a.nd. th,'! sky was black a s 'lhe n~t d.ay l w-ant to our nev.:s.,:.c.l_t.:-:!r offic.;c, tbr~ Ga. 8tte .dt:ra.!.ci~ .illa tLle girl sald, folks ca.liing in h3.d floodad the sNitchboa~u, .. .L.nd a-Ll. of tnalr e1ploye~s had been remarking about it. Ona ~ilD in town said some surveyors working east of Kahok.:.J. w~ r~ do ills that, u.no~he r said it ~as froJl a b:i cge on the ~iv~r. ~ow I think I dld not see the raoon, that it w~s tha re1'Laction center~d u~ in tha c~ouds, as I saw be -S~!J\3d c.t.ouds flouting around the cgntered llght Ut-. ther d.l,lci one~ tne cloud lo.Jkad t'unnel-sha::.ed. lt seeUJs ..i.S tntu&n th~ce snould be so:ne lcglc.::a.l ex.;;lanation, b~t lf tt~r~ ~ad be s owarful encugh to c ast a beam to the ciouds, cou~d tnc] be h~rmful to our eyesight? lf ttere is no reason foL' such ~ iJ~lformance, it should be stopped. I W4Y be bothetin~ you for nothing, but l would like an explan- ~tlon. ~ac~le in genara~ ara ta~ing about it, but if any- one is trying to fir~ out Qbout it, l am not ~ware o f lt. I hope .I !lava not both9r':Kl you for nothing, but iil these kind of times, ~e c~mot be surg of cmythlllg of a 1.\'0rldly nature. ..fU~Lti ty .o~u~.i~ar ....... a..Y. gWls w~re ;e cfe e eel~ in t his e.:>unt ry ~ tn'-Lt t!~a/~L ...... r:b.:;4ot1S' in-tnat tney..couLC. b LLl,d -lt '\:.Ji t~ -: di.3- tc.dlce lf !J()il:t.:~d at c..nyoa~. I apa t:!..~s~ r. ill ~':? .3 t o r~c GL.lla gu~1aaa .l~K~ taa ~ tomic bor!lb, as cn ~y C8U ld 0e c :t t a s ~ r-o- ~hlc in tn~ t\ rone; hanas. :r. .L!Ia.gar ~edera.l Bureau v.ashington, of Investigatio~ ll.fU UU I'Oll APPBOVA'f!tl&U'PBOVAM. OONCUBIUINC88, 0118111 IR ACTIONS MElD ROITINI SLIP DATI C:OOIIDIIIATIOII IIIPO .. ATN (t I) eLv~ SIGIIATUIII FOttM 95 R~'lll DDP'cwmM.l FebM)aadDDFoawll. 1 OCT eo 1 FebiO wh:Ha wW be ond watileMuetei G.-o INI : 0-INl U DATE Of TRANSMinAl IN REPLY R!f!R TO 051 COMMUNICATION rrnna~ittal of Correspondence INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN INITIATED AND REPORTS WILL IE FORWARDED AS SOON AS POSSIBlE. ATTACHED IS REPOIT OP INVESTIGATION. THIS MAnER IS 0 PENDING 0 CLOSED. REQU!ST REPORT OP ACTION TAKEN. ( AFR 124-4) If THIS IS PROCESSED UNDER AFR 1 REQUEST COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH REPORT Of PRIOR INV!STIGATION/SUMMARY AnACHED. NOTE RESTRICTIVE lEGENDS ON FRONT Of THE AnACHMENT(S). RETURN ATTACHMENT($) AFTER HAVING SERVED YOUR PURPOSE. REQUEST AN INDICES CHECK ON ABOVE SUBJECT AND INDIVIDUAl(S) LISTED IN OTHER/REMARKS. WHEN ATTACHMENT($) IS/ ARE REMOVED, THE CLASSIFICATION Of THIS CORRESPONDENCE WILL BE 0 RETAINED 0 DOWNGRADED TO 0 CANCELED 0 MARKED "FOR OffiCIAl USE ONlY." 1. The attached letter from Hr Kahoka, Hiesouri, dated 10 October 196~, referred i~ f orwarded in accordance with ~R 200-2. 2. 7he letter vriter ha~ r-ot co""le t o our attention ?reviously. NAME, GRADE, TITLE, SIGNATURE oi Special bes:igo.joJl.l AnACHMENTS FILE Sl'AM!t AND /OR OTHER