3. DATITIMI G.ou~ PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 2. LOCATION CONCLUSIONS 0 Wos Boll- ,n -------l 0 Prolto .. ly Boli-n .. TYPI OP OISI!RVATION 0 PouiWy Boli-n rJGr.un4-Vhu.l o GrovMRod 0 Wos Ahcreft 0 Prolto .. ly Alrcreft ~- r===~=======:.....!-r~O AI,.VIol 0 Al,..lmercopt RCHior 0 PoniWy Alrcroft Wos Astrono"'lcol :ifeteo r 0 Yea 0 ProltoWy Astronofftlcol m Ne Civ ilia."'1 0 PouiWy Astronomlcol 0 Insufficient Doto fer Evcpluotion o. IRIIP SUMMARY 011 SICHT1NO Observer :.Titnessed .:~at he thnuer:t '-'a::; 1 dnr i n g t..; rr fire (:hit:;~' ATIC J'O"W 329 (IU~V 26 IEP 52) 11. COMMINTS Ob~e~at:o~ of meteo~. JESSEPH, Albert Humboldt, Kansas DATE TIME GROUP PHOTO YES NO PHYSICAl_ SPECIMl=:--l YES NO SOURCE MILITARY CIVILIAN XX OF OBSERI/A!ION d Visual NUMBER OF OBJECTS One COURSE _SV_l SATELLITE: IN ORBIT: VERIFY YES: NO: DECAY: None 'l'his Date METEOR PI"obabl.y REFLECTION _ INVERSION PRESENT _ LENTICULAR CLOUD _ BRI=F SUMMARY OF SIGH l iNG: PHOTO ANALYSIS ----------- PHYSICAL SPECIMEN ANALYSIS----- Observar witnessed . .mat he thought was a satellite decay. Observation after sunset during t;f-~i t. Object described as a ball of fire (whitish) ~ovL~g toward the Southwestfor 1-2 seconds at vmich time it disintegrated. EVALUATION: CASECATEGORY: A r_o~( t_e_o_r_)~- --~-- - -~ CONCLUSION: Observation of meteor.