Cannonafb Newmexico — January 1961

Category: 1961  |  Format: PDF  |  File: 1961-01-8627992-CannonAFB-NewMexico.pdf
Keywords: rjwfbh, interrogation, witness, kgtound, aattonomicoive, evoluotieft, urtlcmwn, aoohwtni, w1tnesses, detera5ine, siecu, reciediencii, eluffije, derer, inessss, lacee, 09czcsqc794zcwyb046, horizon, astronomict, lassifi, posalltly, clasiii, inetructione, 1544z, aatronolc
View in interactive archive →
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 2. .LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS 0 Was Balloon 1 Jan 61 Cannon .AFB N w Mexico D Proltaltly Balloon 3. DATITIMI GROUP r ~ Locat-2055 D Waa Aircraft %kGtound-Viauol D GrounciRodor 0 ProltaWy Aircraft D Was AattonoMicoiVe,YUS ProltoWy Astronomict.l D Posalltly Aatronolc.e 7. LENGTH Ofi.OIIIRYATION I. NUMIII 011 OIJICTS 9. COURSI 10-20 Sec. 1 Desce 0 lnsufflclont Doto r.r. Evoluotieft D UrtlcMwn R~tili,~su~MM~A~R~vAo;,~.~aooHwTni"NoiS -Shaped-ahJ~eecC.tt,;-~11'' cio~MM~EN~Tns~w1tnesses were sitting in an size of d at arms length. White changed auto, and whether it was a convertible o dull red. Appeared NW 45 above horizon. or hard top would detera5ine whether Disappeared NW 30 above horizon. Moved could see as high above the horizon as slowlY straight down, then horizontal to left, w,as reported. Planet Venus was in aprox then up increasing speed, then angled down to position reported by witnesses. right toward the horizon. Gize of the obJe reported were probably due to clouds id not appear to vary as it d~scended. the area and atmoaphere. ObJect was re- ported to have moved toward N, which coincides with movement of planet dur A its apparent descent toward the horizon ATIC PORK 3D (RBY 26 SBP 52) TO RJ TF:\L/CJ.!D!1 E:~.JT J\.FE COLO 32ND P.! R ?OL!CE 2t;Di!., SIECU.-ITY CLASIII~ICA' I JOINT MESSAGEF'ORM illlt;.LASSIFI ill SPACB Bl!.LOIF RESl!R.Vl!D POR COMMUNICATION CENTBR ,.RECIEDIENCII TY .. E MSO (CI,cl) ACCOUNTING OAIG, o.-RI!~EAS TO ROUTINE ooiC MULTI I Hau CLASSI~ICATION 01' RE~IE.-I!NCIE ATIC W-P AFB CANN~ AFB NM TJNCLAS/ A~ IN-4E2x 8J2D AIR DIV, YOUR MSG AD/DO! 01-471, DTD 19 JAN 61. HOW DID ,f ('i'NESS D~ElUffiJE THE OHJ MuVC,;D STRAIGHT Do:,rJ? Hu:v DID 'l'HE UBJ DTSA...:lPE..ut? HOW LJNG ii..\S 1'riE UBJ T~I STGn'r? ft:=;Q A C!fiCK BE NADE TO DErER.~NE IF THE1E 1v.,RII; AUY Ol'HSti ,_ii'INESSSS, AND IF SO, :a:HE.IR ACCOUNT OF THE SIGHTING ilE F:JD 'l 0 AT [ C, A''l'N: AFCIN-hE2x. SPECIAL INeTRUCTIONe .. o.rr.por.en t. 3 FORM 1 7 3 RE,..LACEe DD "ORM 173, I OCT 4e, WHICH WILL 811: U81ED UNTIL UHAU.-TIED ZCZ~SQP~09CZCSQC794ZCWYB046 DE RJWFBH 22A THE TIME OF OBSERVATION. THE FIRST t~ITNESS,-AN AIR POLICE AIRMAN, WAS TJlE SOURCE OF THE ORIGINAL REPORT. PAGE TWO RJWFBH 22A . INTERROGATION OF THE SECOND WITNESS REVEAL- ED ESSENTIALLY THE SAME INFORMATION REPORTED BY THE FIRST WIT- NEss, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE OBJECT,S COLOR. THE SECOND WITNESS DESCRIBED OBJECT,S COLOR FIRST AS PINK, THEN TURNING A BRIGHT RED. THE THIRD PERSON IN THE CAR REQUIRED GLASSES TO SEE, BUT WAS NOT WEARING THEM AND DID NOT OBSERVE THE OBJECT. A COMPLETE REPORT OF THE SECOND WITNESS INTERROGATION WILL BE FORWARDED UPON REQUEST. HOt-lEVER, THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN THEIR n~o OBSERVATIONS WAS ON THE COLOR OF THE OBJECT. 01/1544Z FEB RJWFBH