PHOJECT 10073 l~cCORD CA~D 2. LOCATION 12. CONCLUSIONS CJ We s Oulloun Be1lin Ge r many DATE71\t~ CROlJ? 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION CJ P robably 8 clloon -------1 0 Possioly Be~lloo n fJ Ground-Visual 0 G round Radar CJ AI.-Vi su ol 0 Air-lntercl.lpt Radar 7. LENGTH OF OSSERVATION 8. NUMSER OF OBJECTS 9. COURSE lQ. BRIEP SUMMARY OF SIGHTING Detailed rpt o.f metevr .:bt~rvation fm Genaan Uation3l requestir..g inf'o a s t o ccrz.par:!.~c.n w/rptd rr.eteor in ne.,spa.per. ATIC PORW 3:1 (RZV 26 SF.P 52) 11. COMMENTS Astro ( Meteor ) 0 Was Aircraft a Probably Ai rcra h 0 Possibly Ai ((;r oft 0 Was Astronomi col '?-'~ teor 0 Probably Astronomical 0 Possibly A s t ronomical 0 lnsuffi c:iol\t Data fo r Evaluatio n 0 Unk.,own Tan 'l:'UM tJ A ft..;rtJ~ "ls '_[ CCNl ~t{ R r tJ tK f: 1 . Ti1~ AT.[C files fall t o indicate 21 J-sca;,ix~r 195?, rc.fc.ccnc(:u i.n 1 ls rcoor~ of tne L'lO ~JirntLng for oc ~ervccl t.he d c:;crlption ~: iv0n by by her ivas very pro'uc.Lly a rr.eteor. J. Dur! to the fact that A'i'IC fiJ.es do not r~vea1 a case f or 21 De c err.b8r 1959, \ Te are unable to mako corre latiorJ b e i."!Je&n he r sighL'i nc and the one she read of in the neHS'Jaocr. h. The-: address of thr:l :Ti tness i.s L:.S fo1lo:r:.;: Cy 1 t r 25 Feb bO, sl'uj: Hefcrral of Corre s :1/Atch 'l:'1i 3 i9 to .:~c:<.!"..clfl3~a your lat.t.ar r_)( 13 3oru~ry lJOO ~("\ncet.mlng an t.n1uanti:lldd :l'ly:t:~ ol1ject ~lQil"t.l.ag. Un1 ted :3tata:5 .:\:!.r .li'o~c.:~ filo:t i:lil :::.o i::ldlca U! uny co:r:o;-ela tion be-~,J'e~n you-r si.;ht.!~!g ci ti:e ona yuu 1 ~-ld o.l in tea n~w a~dr. l?rom your deacr!p tion of t!le obj~c~ y ou c,-g-..,, it -., .. ,..3 :):r:;ot.ibly u ._.- t~or. P3y~o erapeut1n tlajor, U.3A:i' Publ1~ !nfo~ation Divi~ion Of:t'iC$ of' !~ormation . C'Jr "b'l cl:- ! rule z: