PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD I. DATITIMI GROUP 2. .LOCATION .. nPI Of OISEIVATION Q O..untl-Vi auel 12. CONCLUSIONS D Prolteltlr Balloon D Wea Alrcreft Proltoltlr Aircraft Pe sal W' AI rcroft 111111 OP SIGHTING B r i K n t. ~(i ow i n g o b j , s t u t ion a r y f o .1 2 r.tihs. Appeared very !Jright & glowiug wh1.le col'~tinua.tl~' mov1.ng I 1. COMMENTS i11 au lHlusual ci rcul~tl~ lttoti o c . Sud don 1 y o o j soar~, c s c.!' a i ~ h t u 1- , turned blRcK & : a small white tra~l uc:Jhil'U. fo1e4o ?, Ohio u.r.o. Dllet.oa lr~t Pattereoa Alr roroe Ja.a Dertoa, Ohio Oa September 8, 1958, about 6&3() PM, lt waa t to my atteDtlon by the neJ&hborhoo4 ohlluen that then wae a bright c1oviJ16 ob.1ect 111 tu eJq. !bie ob.1eot at.re4 1tat tor IT two tAiDutee tro. the tiM I aav lt. It rT br~t clowiQg coat be 1a aD circular motloa. thie ob~ect aoared ... white trail ORt of lch' I took tb eaaloeect photocnrpha .111' before the ob~ect 4le- ~t ot 1i.ght. It a.ppear aa a blaOk -.pot bT a white trail of Yapor. I have eno1rcle4 the obJeot with a ,rea1e pencil OD the D8C&tiYel. The prlDtt lhov a white cil'cle arcmna the ob~ect. I paaabc theae photocraph on to for vhRteTer ln- t loa the7 " Sbcere]Jr, (V) Requeat tor Pboto Anal;yaia UCIN4Ele 13 Oct COM.IIT 10. 1 Attlla MaJ. Bucklllater 1. Request your renew a4 o nte ot the attaobed photoarapba. 2. The object in the pboto, llhere it appeara to be olimbiJl&, looks like r-100 aeriea alroratt, in a ol1mb1D attitude. 3 Altboueh the te~ 2 m1Dutea t tile atatea tbat tbe objeot ... atat1oDar7 tor approxi- , ~14 appreciate your o ae to 1Dd1oate jet a1roratt 1D tllbt. ta to aubatutiate this ezpleetion. ..-.LI T. GLASm Co1oDe 1, USA I' IUUCU POIIII .. I OCI .0 WIICM MAY ._ U. L OOW&Rrtllft 'MIISID nc1: ltu 0 tll"l 1 (U) lequeat tor Photo Anal7aia AJCIN-4A2t/M&j Conkey/lv 1. The attached photograph are ot auoh poor quality aa to preclude anr accurate eval tion be7ond pure conjecture 2. It ia recommended that the original film be made available to thia office and/or 4D2 tor evaluation. .It is poaaible that an optical rather a photographic e ment would provide us with enough tion to either oont~ or den7 your explanation. P. LUNDQUIST Colonel, USA' TO& A.FCIN-4.A2t DA'fE 7 Nov 5BJ" .. COM '.IT l !F. 3 4E4/T/SL!~oli~u/6~216/Bldt f23 1. In accordance with you.r recoc:anend~tion, th., attached orie-inal net,.atives are torvez~ed to your ottice tor evaluation. l Inola& .Added 1 Incl. 2. Ori~ necatiYea frped 13 Oo' j8 J.;hlo print De Mr. Poda ~1oee4 are the aecatlTet 7ou I late their whea 7ft are throuch vi~ them. 1 ( U) Request tor Photo Analyaia 'ro I Ali'CIN-4E4 FROM: AFCnJ-4A2t DATI: 24 Jlov 58 liR. 4 MaJor Cc,nkey /ls 1. The qual.i ty of the two neeo.tives is so poor tltn.t we ca.rmot dP.firti t'!l:t' identity til e obJect in queatio11. In all r-robabili ty the itflf~gt! was ca.us~(-~ 1J~, an a.:t.rcrat't, it.t 1'lieht ue cannc:'t idcnti~J 1 t i~S to s eries or t~ r,e. HOWARD L. COioo:Y MaJor, USAF O.Mr t ~' TM .... ,, were 'o be ot ewm tuall., Ule otJ' la tuM'i\JD OCM&ld DOt be deflAltel.J ldeD,1 tl.S. traa the rail let' by tu ob-'"' it la tell tu GtJ vu pro&lab~ ea ia tli.-' Jo.-iaHNat Ia 'bia ..... h &na'J, APJrlaHcle