CONCLUSIONS Was (}.,lloon Probably Balloon Po:> :si ;.,1 y Boll oon Wo. Aircraft Probably Air craft Possibly Aircr aft Wo'5 Astranomi col P robably Astronoonica l Possi bly Astronomical \2. LCCXTI0:-1 J, C~icfi,..IE C~OIJP .I. TYPE Or OBSERVATIOI'I Grovnu Vi suo\ Ground Rod o r Ai~ Vi suol 1\ir-lnterccJpl Radar LENCTH OF OBSERVA TIOH HU).ISER OF OBJECTS 0 ' '\nsuffictent Data for Evaluat ion a~IEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING """l1isne1d. r ? RJZDDN RJEDSQ. !lJF.:PNY RJEPHQ T0 ~J~JON/CO~lDR ADC Z?~Q/Ul~ OF INTEL HQ USAF ?OLLO'JIN.:; FURN!S:1E~ IN ACCOR~ANCE WITH AFR ~0-2 <DI OK AT Fll~ST: OE'JI:CT CHAXGJ, TC 7.4>'C F.C.RTS i-1S IT \'l-.".:.~.;:::n (C) TOO F AY TO OESERVE CH) DID NOT H[AR ANY PhGE T~O RJEPQW 97 (2) CA) ACCIDENTALLY NOTICED IN THE SKY. ALSO OBSERVED BY FIVE COMAPN IOI~S <B>~ERHfAD T O TH~O~TK:FROM ~ANTAGH (C) ~ERHEAD TO THE NORTH .... ; 7D) Na/ MANEUVERS <S )-'JIVE TO TEN Ml~UTs..: GROUND-VISUAL Nf..KED EYE NOT LIKE hN AI RCP.AFT AI\ Tf..G.!, LONG !SL?.l~D t-JEH YORK. ~ 6) STUDEt\T c LOI~G ISL?.l.:D, NEv.' YORJ~. FIV!:. ADDITIOt\AL COt"i?n~IOUS ? i\GE THrl~E RJEPQfJ 9115 <C) UNLIMITED ~ftolO T OUSAND SCATTERED -F..QUR THOUSAND SCA TTEREJL (' ELIVE J '!I-? 'V""'t v (Z) T :iO TE:NTH ~,') UNUSUAL if::TSOR OLOG !CAL P !iENONNA A CONSTELL~TION AIRCRAFT t101JED TOj~ARD THE OBJI!:CT,. \'\/"" .,_ <./ ~ SU3SEQUENTLY T HE oaJECT VANISHED AS THE ~IRCRAFT DREJI N!AR ,~\J ., Al~DROME OFFIC~R, CA?TAIN A. A. MOLNAR. PE~SON ~AXI~G J:::?ORT STATES HE ~AS A 11:7.::18ZR OF T HE GROUND o asERV:::R CORP A.ID SZ:1ZD V~RY E.~R~'SST tJ:-iiTE ~1A:<ING REPORT. A . 1JRCMZ O?FICER -~AS NOT ?~SCNAL CCM~:::~TS ..