PROJECT 10073 RECORD CAPO CONCLUSIONS 0 Was Balloon I fr~!J )d Or1 io Riv'?r, P robably Balloon Possi;,ly Balloon 3. OATETI.\4.!: CRCUP 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION -fl Ground Vi suol 0 Ground-Radar 0 Was Aircraft 0 Probably Aircraft 0 Air-Visual 0 Air-Intercept Radar 0 Po ssi bl y Ai rcroft Was Astronomi col 0 Probably Astronomo col Phvs Snec. Ci;ili'1:1 0 Possibly Astronomical 7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION NUMBE~ OF OBJECTS COURSE '0" 0 Insufficient Data for Evaluation 8~1Er SUWAARY 0" SIGHTING 11. COMMENTS ,;}J.lf plastic :ibre The device p i cked 'i D r .1di.:t:)a ~v~ntua: rnent l.n nun"tt>-S. into r:"1r:h's nor1 -:01 t'll '1.nal,sis. 5th District, Derlce ?1c2d U:p on Ohio B1 "1~ in Icdiana 1. The device is a magnetoueter for remote measurement or the strength o:t the eezth ' mgnetie field. The sensing element being supported 'by a pendulns :nounting ahovs that it measures tbe s'b'ength or the haraontal componen~ or the aarth'a magnetic field. 2. It vu probably carried to a high altitude b;r a balloon and then uanawdtted ~ield atrength meaSUlerrenta by telemetry to a ground s.tation. G. T. GRmORI capt, USAF ~-.?L dt5'/rtcT t::'S I JtV't TA .e VA/ v,;11/ tJI( . S C:.rJS I A1 C- s J.fd w s ]7 U/fJ5 PrZcd]~ISLy C~R...R-tt=o 7a A. tJ lb J,.J A L{l rvQ~ d3 y A f]/; LLC>vJ A"-../...!)