N. Luffenham, England 3. SOURCE 10. CONCLUSION Air Attache (USAF) I NSUFFI CIE!JT DA'fA FOR EVALUATION 4. HUMBER OF OaJECTS s. LENGTH OF OBS!RVATION ot Reported 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Vis ut'!.l object re seltlbl e s a/c observation of b.J.lloon ".Iith p2.cl::J.6C Additional invcstigat,ive data n ot rc;ceiv ed. Case regarded as Pilot flying 2B ,000 ft a t night :::;uctdml y c ame upon an object h aving 6 light s , taking e vasive a.ction he approached ob ject from tho s ide. vJhen his aircr~ft dreH n ev.r ltehts \rent out Air-Visual -Ground-Rae ar)and obj e ct vanished. This t ook pl a c e over an a tom- bomb e r ~------------1 traininG base. Object \1-ra s confirn~ed bJ round r a d ar. Atte:r.1. ll i s beinr; r.lelcle by Air Ninistry t o resolve sighting. 9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FTC SEP 63 0329 (TOE) P"Yiou ecUUctftt ol thh lora ... , b9 u .. d.