Pl~OJECT 10073 RECORD CAr~D 2. LOCATION 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION XXI Ground-Visual 0 GroundRodor 0 Airlntercopt Radar 0 Was Astronomi c'll Civilian (11 yr old) 0 Probably Astronomical 0 Possibly Astrofl'omic:ol 8. NUMB:.:R OF OBJECTS 9. COURSE 0 , Other _ 0 Insufficient Data for Evaluation to. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING 11. COMMENTS Observer looking west through a pair of toy binoculars and he observed a white light in the skyo Light traveling slowly to the west. Disappeared after approx five A'l'IC FORM 3'29 (REV 26 SEP 52) Age of source diinitely a factor although Flight 2-C r eports he probably did s~e an obj. Follow up inves- tigation came to no definite conclusions but in their opinion the sighting was probably a balloon of the radio-sonde type. YD'.?l4l VYA244 V\:B.J97YQA;J43 J~::P.{O/ DIJ.:ECTOR OF I t,ITELLlGEllCE: }IDC:.S USAF, Ltis;; D~SC~IPTIC~ OF OBJ ECT C. \JHI T LIGHT ~. t:H IT~ LIGHT t-;o tf I ~!G SLOtiL Y J.: EPORTED PtFB OHip----- LIGHT tiOVED SLO~jLY CH.i l:JEST CO!IHSE . i.JEi/f O~rr OF SIG; ;r ltJ DISTPd~C.E LOCATIOi~S OF OBSERVER ~1 LYt~N DRIVE, DECATUR , GIOf!GIA :I!~CA Tl:R , GEOHGIA LOCATED APP~O~':It1ATELY FAST OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA. I DENTIFYING I NFORMATION OF ALL PBS~RV~RS TE1~Et: J ESYQ ;Jl S DERRIL DRIVE TtLEPHO~E UMERRR c:-::ILI ,;G VISIBILITY CLOUD COV~R SCATTER~D C I \1 I L LJ r~ SIG!!Tir:G VISIDILITY 15 ~.;UtO:Ei=tOL.S AIR TRAFFIC BOTH CIVILIAN Ai'lD ,.,prtl 19SS 3. OATETIMI! CROUP .5. PHPTOS 1. LENGTH OP OBSERVATION UFOB INDEX CARD 2. LOCATION tur, Georgia 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION ~Ground Visual 0 Air-Visual B. NUMBER OF OBJE C Ground-Radar 0 Air-Intercept Radar CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon Probably Balloon Possi.bly Balloon Was Ai rerah Probably Aircraft Possibly Aircraft 0 Was Astronomi col P robobly Astronomi col Possibly Astronomical lnsuffi ei ent Doto for Evaluation 10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING ' loold ng west through a pa' r o to7 he o a white light in Light traveling elowl~ to the west. attar approx.-.t1 ve ( S) minutes. AlSOP Farm 5 (15 Oct 54) Age ot source defini tel3' is a f'actor although Flight 2-c xseporta he pro- l:abl.y' did see an object. Tne follow- up investigation b7 Flight 2-c. The tion to no de..-.., n:J te conclusions but in their ~nion the a:l.ghting vas possib]J a bal J.on o~ tbe