2. LOCATION CONCLUSIONS Was Balloon 9 NOV 19~4 &IBM. fAASS. Probably Balloon OATETIME GROUP TYPE OF OBSERVATION 0 Poss bl y Balloon ll Ground Vi suol 0 Ai~Visuol LENCTH OF OBSERVATION NUMBER OF OS J ECTS B~IEF SUMMARY OF SICHTING SHP!RE, WHI'm, IJER! BRIG11T, SK6l-!ED !0 BE SrA TIC!fARY BOT JUMPING, FADED OUt. 0 Ground-Radar Was Aircraft P robobl y A~rcroft 0 Air-Intercept Rodo,. Poss1bly A~rcroft 0 Was Astranomcal Probably Astronomical Poss1bly Astronom1col In suffi c ent Octo for Evaluation 0 UnknoWT"J FITS 1'BE SPECIFIC.\ '!'IONS (]? A BALLCOB. :..WSUFFIC I8NT D.A T.l TO WARR.AJ'r !lUR'l'EER DV!STIDA TIOll ..\ISO P Form 5 (1.5 Oct H)